@CSKA_Moscou said in #109:
> The idea of a comet with microbial life forms was for some time a viable hypothesis, even though the chances that these microbes or cells could survive an impact and acclimatize are almost zero. a serious idea would be that it would be the fruit of chemical reactions which would have generated the environment conducive to life, then, life itself.
that still doesnt answer anything because that comet would've had to come from somewhere too.
> why would a spaceship with a superior intelligent species want to risk going to a furnace like earth, to play chemists?
>
> It's impossible and not scientific.
>
> we must consider that it is the result of an exceptional chance. and metaphysically speaking, the appearance of life and its evolution are a divine miracle. The Permian Triassic extinction destroyed 95% of life on earth. So yes, we are lucky
the word 'divine' is precisely correct. we are here bc God decided to put us here, not bc of stuff spawning from nowhere and bumping into each other.
> The idea of a comet with microbial life forms was for some time a viable hypothesis, even though the chances that these microbes or cells could survive an impact and acclimatize are almost zero. a serious idea would be that it would be the fruit of chemical reactions which would have generated the environment conducive to life, then, life itself.
that still doesnt answer anything because that comet would've had to come from somewhere too.
> why would a spaceship with a superior intelligent species want to risk going to a furnace like earth, to play chemists?
>
> It's impossible and not scientific.
>
> we must consider that it is the result of an exceptional chance. and metaphysically speaking, the appearance of life and its evolution are a divine miracle. The Permian Triassic extinction destroyed 95% of life on earth. So yes, we are lucky
the word 'divine' is precisely correct. we are here bc God decided to put us here, not bc of stuff spawning from nowhere and bumping into each other.