@ParentalAdvisory I got to playing chess a lot when I was around 25, I some time later after reading some books and getting some experience playing, I had an opportunity to take lessons from a GM, and I remember, when asked what my goal is, I said "I want to become [at least] IM". Looking back, I see how foolish it was.
I'd say, that at my peak I was around 1st rank chess player (not sure, I called it properly in English - the rank under CM). At some point I realized, how much work I'll have to put into that in order to improve further (always hard and often unpleasant, doing something that I wasn't comfortable doing), and I gave up. Now, I was working a fulltime job, so I had much less time available, and I believe I made a reasonable choice not trying to chase that dream.
To me personally, even though I was fascinated with chess having not played it for 10 years before getting back to in the age of 25, and I was enjoying every little bit of positional nuances I was able to comprehend at all times. One might confuse what I was feeling with passion. Make sure you know if you are this one.
You didn't specify what you mean by "Pro", but to me it sounds like
@RegisLakrids nailed it. If chess was your passion, you'd already be spending all of your free time studying it.
I'd recommend you giving it the best you can for a year, and then evaluate the result. See if you are satisfied with the progress, see if you enjoy it and that your work ethic is good. If you are satisfied, then by all means continue and review the progress a year later. Repeat until you are "Pro" or come to realize that chess is just a hobby for you.